The Supreme Court’s ruling establishes that disciplinary authorities have the discretion to forfeit gratuity based on the nature of the misconduct, without needing a criminal conviction. This decision ...
4. As the appellant is not a signatory to the cheque, he is not liable under Section 138 of the 1881 Act. As it is only the signatory to the cheque is liable under Section 138, unless the case is ...
11h
The Pioneer on MSNSupreme Court to hear on Monday plea over shortage of anti-retroviral drugs for treating HIV patientsAs per the cause list of February 24 uploaded on the apex court website, a bench comprising Justices Abhay S Oka and Ujjal ...
7h
India Today on MSNFrom the India Today archives (2015) : A beef history of hateAssam’s pursuit of an alleged beef transporter—criticised by the Supreme Court—is a reminder on the politics of diet first ...
Justice Abhay S Oka emphasised that in every legal battle, the ultimate objective must be the pursuit of justice ...
Supreme Judicial Appointment Ordinance, 2025: A critical analysis of transparency and accountability
Globally, judicial appointment frameworks differ considerably across jurisdictions, reflecting different approaches to ...
Speaking as the chief guest in prize distribution function of 21st K K Luthra Memorial Moot Court, 2025 held at India Habitat ...
9hon MSN
The Supreme Court on February 23, ruled that a preliminary inquiry is not mandatory before registering an FIR against a ...
8h
Hosted on MSNIf there is a delay in depositing the credit card bill, then a huge penalty will be imposed, know here what the Supreme Court has ordered.If you often miss paying the credit card bill, then be ready for a higher penalty. The Supreme Court has ruled that banks can ...
Some results have been hidden because they may be inaccessible to you
Show inaccessible results