The Supreme Court’s ruling establishes that disciplinary authorities have the discretion to forfeit gratuity based on the nature of the misconduct, without needing a criminal conviction. This decision ...
4. As the appellant is not a signatory to the cheque, he is not liable under Section 138 of the 1881 Act. As it is only the signatory to the cheque is liable under Section 138, unless the case is ...
As per the cause list of February 24 uploaded on the apex court website, a bench comprising Justices Abhay S Oka and Ujjal ...
Assam’s pursuit of an alleged beef transporter—criticised by the Supreme Court—is a reminder on the politics of diet first ...
Justice Abhay S Oka emphasised that in every legal battle, the ultimate objective must be the pursuit of justice ...
Globally, judicial appointment frameworks differ considerably across jurisdictions, reflecting different approaches to ...
Speaking as the chief guest in prize distribution function of 21st K K Luthra Memorial Moot Court, 2025 held at India Habitat ...
The Supreme Court on February 23, ruled that a preliminary inquiry is not mandatory before registering an FIR against a ...
If you often miss paying the credit card bill, then be ready for a higher penalty. The Supreme Court has ruled that banks can ...