Fiscal hawks in the House helped hold up passage of Trump's 'big, beautiful bill' on Wednesday — but their resolve wasn't ...

Humans recognize their world 80 percent of the time through their eyes. Learn more about your five senses, the good and the bad. Science Trek is available to stream on pbs.org and the free PBS App ...

We use our five senses to enjoy foods and wines in today’s world. Unlike hundreds of years ago when food and wine were just something to consume to stay alive, our world has provided we consumers the ...

But nature offers more than just colors, and studies have shown that using all the senses can be good for your health.

Filibuster length: 13 hours Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., revived the tradition of talking filibusters, protesting U.S. drone policy by blocking a vote on CIA Director John Brennan and holding the floor ...

Taking psychedelics is considered by many to be a multi-sensory experience–but exactly how do they affect each of our five senses? Professor of Psychiatry and Neuroscience Rachel Yehuda, PhD ...

5 senses? Don't be so limited.The idea that humans only have five senses is old. It’s so old, in fact, that it has essentially become received wisdom that few of us think about. One of the ...

MANHASSET, N.Y.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--New research from Northwell Health’s Feinstein Institutes for Medical Research suggests the relationship between the five senses and immune system plays a ...

That doesn't mean they're stupid. It means they stopped using their five senses to form rational views about politics. Rational views come from seeing, hearing, feeling, smelling and tasting.

Sen. Cory Booker's record-breaking Senate speech wasn't technically a filibuster, but it still put the word in focus. Here's what to know about its history, from the swashbuckling to the stonewalling.

For young children, these senses are still developing, and sometimes their brains can struggle to process all the sensory information coming in. This is where sensory dysregulation comes into play, ...

The reason why Booker’s speech wasn’t technically a filibuster is because, while it exercised his right to unlimited debate, it was not an effort to delay a specific piece of legislation.